Train Crashes With Spent Fuel Onboard
February 1997- Train in France derails with deadly spent nuclear fuel on board.


SPENT FUEL QUICK FACTS:

The following information is provided by the Nuclear Information and Resource Service
Radioactive Waste Project, 1424 16th Street NW, #601, Washington, DC 20036
Note: These facts were prepared for the proposed Yucca Mountain Dump in Nevada, however the essential facts also apply to the proposed Goshute facility.
  • As many as 15,000 shipments to Utah would be made over the next 30 years. Each large train cask carries the long-lived radiological equivalent of 200 Hiroshima bombs. In terms of radioactivity, each fuel assembly contains 10 times the long-lived radioactivity released by the Hiroshima bomb. 

  •  
  • A person standing three feet from unshielded irradiated fuel would receive a lethal radiation dose in 10 seconds. 

  •  
  • Current cask fire standards do not reflect the possibility of a tanker fuel fire. A fire associated with a truck or rail accident increases the probability that radioactivity will be released. Fires occur in 1.6% of all truck and 1% of all train accidents. Shipping containers are designed to withstand a 1/2-hour fire at a temperature of 1475 Fahrenheit. But rail fires could burn for hours, sometimes for days, at temperatures considerably higher. Diesel fuel burns at 1850 Fahrenheit. Some materials burn twice as hot. The heat could vaporize some radioactive materials and sweep them up into the air. Persons downwind could inhale radioactive particulates and later develop cancer or genetic effects. (On July 2, 1997 a collision between two trains in Kansas produced just such an intense diesel fire.) 

  •  
  • Accidents will happen -- the Department of Energy expects at least 15 truck accidents yearly!

  •  
  • New cask designs are more than twice as large as any cask used before, and they will be tested only by computer models, not under actual accident conditions. 

  •  
  • Existing transport routes are designed for commerce and link major population centers;  they are not designed for radioactive waste transportation. 

  •  
  • About 3/4 of the U.S. population could be affected by these shipments. 

  •  
  • Shipping containers are designed to withstand a crash into an immovable object at 30 miles per hour. Obviously Interstate trucks travel much faster than 30 m.p.h. Impact into a bridge abutment or falls off a bridge could easily exceed the design limits of the container. 

  •  
  • None of the containers presently used on highways and rails has been physically tested. These containers were designed and built in the 1960's and '70's. Waste containers have only been tested by computer or hand calculators. Before the flood gates open on nuclear shipments, the Department of Energy should at least require that the new generation of shipping containers presently proposed be actually physically tested, but the Department has no such plans. 


  • NOTE: There is a very real prospect of nuclear sabotage and terrorism happening to these shipments. The bombings at the World Trade Center, Oklahoma City Federal Building, and the Atlanta Olympics point to this threat. What if an act of nuclear terrorism occurred during the to one of the 9 or 10 shipments of high-level nuclear spent fuel that will travel through Salt Lake City each day? 

    Back